What is the evidentiary burden for a direction of trial of an issue?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Conacher Estate, 2003 SKQB 32 (CanLII):
I am satisfied on a review of the independent evidence submitted that the applicants have not met the evidentiary burden for a direction of the trial of an issue as set out in the case of Dieno Estate v. Dieno Estate by Baynton J.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the evidential standard for admission of evidence at trial where issues of trial fairness are concerned? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the burden of demonstrating there is a genuine need for a trial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for making an order without a trial of an issue? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for changing a jury trial to a different jury trial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is there a genuine need to proceed to a full trial of these issues? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a defendant at trial advance the defence of misrepresentation at trial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the trial judge allow the parents of a plaintiff to participate in the trial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the consequences of a trial judge’s failure to spell out every consideration leading to a finding of credibility? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of proof required for a learned trial judge to prove a claim of false imprisonment? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the grounds of appeal against the finding that a learned trial judge erred in fact and law in ruling that the force used was substantial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
