Is there a genuine need to proceed to a full trial of these issues?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Prekaski v Prekaski, 2013 SKQB 233 (CanLII):
Third, on the basis of the material filed, the court cannot definitely determine that the Gordon v. Goertz criteria are met in this case. There is a genuine need for this matter to proceed to a full trial of these issues.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the evidential standard for admission of evidence at trial where issues of trial fairness are concerned? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
When is a variation proceeding not a corollary relief proceeding? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge order a determination of "the precise question, the precise fact which was put issue and decided" in the previous proceeding? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for making an order without a trial of an issue? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the evidentiary burden for a direction of trial of an issue? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for changing a jury trial to a different jury trial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a defendant at trial advance the defence of misrepresentation at trial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the trial judge allow the parents of a plaintiff to participate in the trial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the burden of demonstrating there is a genuine need for a trial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of proof required for a learned trial judge to prove a claim of false imprisonment? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
