What factors were considered to have rendered defendant's plea coerced?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Gomez, E063888 (Cal. App. 2016):

Here, no combination of factors rendered defendant's plea coerced. The court's misunderstanding about a prior gun strike was corrected. Defendant's confusion about his bond was not the court or his attorney's fault. (People v. Nocelotl, supra, 211 Cal.App.4th at p. 1096.) Based on the evidence, the court rationally concluded that defendant was not under duress when he pleaded guilty. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that good cause to withdraw defendant's plea was not shown here.

Other Questions


Is a defendant's claim that the court should have deleted reference to irrelevant mitigating factors from the instructions given to the jury regarding the aggravating and mitigating factors to be considered in determining the appropriate penalty? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's Special Instruction No. 3 required to inform the jury that it is free to select a sentence of life without parole even if the aggravating factors outweigh the mitigating factors? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury double-count the factors used to determine whether a defendant has been convicted of a capital crime as a result of the factor? (California, United States of America)
Does section 8.85 of the California Criminal Code, which instructed the jury to consider whether or not certain mitigating factors were present, unconstitutionally suggest that the absence of such factors amounted to aggravation? (California, United States of America)
Can the jury consider the importance of the age factor in determining whether or not the evidence should be considered "triple count" or "double count"? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant argued that the absence of a number of statutory mitigating factors should be considered aggravating? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a jury consider a defendant's prior armed robbery convictions as an aggravating factor in determining that he committed two other crimes? (California, United States of America)
How has factor (a) been considered in determining that a defendant's use or attempted use of force was an aggravating circumstance? (California, United States of America)
What factors are considered mitigating factors in a conviction for residential burglary? (California, United States of America)
Is gross unfairness a factor in defendant's claim that the jury was not instructed to consider each charge separately? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.