Is gross unfairness a factor in defendant's claim that the jury was not instructed to consider each charge separately?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. O'Malley, 199 Cal.Rptr.3d 1, 365 P.3d 790, 62 Cal.4th 944 (Cal. 2016):

(People v. Merriman, supra, 60 Cal.4th at p. 46, 177 Cal.Rptr.3d 1, 332 P.3d 1187, italics omitted.) Here, defendant fails to point to any specific event or events that would demonstrate gross unfairness. He argues that the court failed to preinstruct the jury about its duty to consider each charge separately. This omission, however, does not demonstrate unfairness. As defendant concedes, the jury was so instructed at the end of the guilt trial and before it began its deliberations, and defense counsel reiterated the point in his closing argument to the jury. "We presume the jury understood and followed the instruction." (People v. Homick (2012) 55 Cal.4th 816, 873, 150 Cal.Rptr.3d 1, 289 P.3d 791.)

Other Questions


Is gross unfairness a factor in defendant's claim that the jury was not instructed to consider each charge separately? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the court should have deleted reference to irrelevant mitigating factors from the instructions given to the jury regarding the aggravating and mitigating factors to be considered in determining the appropriate penalty? (California, United States of America)
What factors will the court consider in deciding whether to join the murder charge with the domestic violence charge as a separate set of charges under section 954 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a valid claim to be able to claim damages from a defendant who has been found guilty of a similar claim against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
What are the factors that determine whether a defendant should face separate criminal charges in separate criminal cases? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant is convicted of a lesser charge of a greater charge of sexual assault, is the lesser charge necessarily included in the greater charge? (California, United States of America)
What factors will a court consider when determining the maximum fine for a defendant who is convicted of a charge of gross negligence? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury need to convict a defendant of a lesser charge before the charge requiring acquittal of the greater charge is considered? (California, United States of America)
Does section 8.85 of the California Criminal Code, which instructed the jury to consider whether or not certain mitigating factors were present, unconstitutionally suggest that the absence of such factors amounted to aggravation? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's Special Instruction No. 3 required to inform the jury that it is free to select a sentence of life without parole even if the aggravating factors outweigh the mitigating factors? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.