What evidence exists that defendant had the intent, expressed by word and deed, to murder the victim?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Superior Court (Grilli), 148 Cal.Rptr. 740, 84 Cal.App.3d 506 (Cal. App. 1978):

Drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of the information, it is clear that defendant had the intent, expressed by word and deed during the course of the conduct for which he was committed, to murder the victim. It is equally clear that defendant made a direct and unequivocal act toward that end by twice choking the victim into unconsciousness. It is reasonable to infer that defendant was dissuaded from killing her the second time he choked her only by the arrival of other people (People v. Van Buskirk, supra, 113 Cal.App.2d at p. 793, 249 P.2d 49). The evidence also establishes

Page 743

Other Questions


What evidence does the Attorney General have to prove defendant planned the murder because he consciously reached for the knife in his pocket and struck the victim with the intent to kill? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant charged with the murder or attempted murder of an intended target also be convicted of the murder of other, nontargeted persons? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found guilty of aiding and abetting a murder if the actual perpetrator of the same murder is convicted of murder? (California, United States of America)
What is sufficient evidence to have been sufficient evidence for a jury to find that defendant intentionally poisoned a patient? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found guilty of first degree murder without intent if the death of an unintended victim was reasonably foreseeable? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have authority to exclude evidence where a defendant has been found to be contrary to the evidence code under section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the prosecution's argument that defendant was not guilty of express-malice murder but at most of murder with implied malice? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant charged with murder introduce evidence of voluntary intoxication to demonstrate the absence of either express or implied malice? (California, United States of America)
Is sufficient evidence supporting defendant's conviction of murder based on the provocative act murder theory? (California, United States of America)
Can the felony-murder rule be applied to a charge of assault and murder in a case where appellant entered the home with intent to commit assault or murder? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.