What is the prosecution's argument that defendant was not guilty of express-malice murder but at most of murder with implied malice?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Whitfield, 27 Cal.Rptr.2d 858, 7 Cal.4th 437, 868 P.2d 272 (Cal. 1994):

The prosecution's theory that defendant was not guilty of express-malice murder, but at most of murder with implied malice, became clear at closing argument, at which time the prosecutor perceptively told the jury, "Remember, he didn't have the intent to kill. There's no question that he had no intent to kill. And you'll receive an instruction explaining that to you." He then quoted the instruction and stated, "Consequently, you are being told by the law don't try [to] figure that the traffic collision--that the traffic violation that caused this death was the intentional act, because it's never going to be intentional in these types of murders. Never will be." (Italics added.) Although the argument itself does not carry any legal authority (see People v. Clair (1992) 2 Cal.4th 629, 663, fn. 8, 7 Cal.Rptr.2d 564, 828 P.2d 705), it, combined with the instructions viewed as a whole, allows me to fairly conclude the murder case proceeded to the jury only on the basis of implied malice and general intent.

With this posture of the case in mind, I turn to defendant's claims of error.

Defendant first contends that sections 22, 187 and 188 permit him to introduce evidence of his voluntary drunkenness to counter a charge of implied-malice murder, whether or not implied-malice murder is a specific intent crime. Citing the well-established principle that a construction making some words redundant is to be avoided (e.g., People v. Woodhead (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1002, 1010, 239 Cal.Rptr. 656, 741 P.2d 154), defendant argues that section 22 must permit him to introduce evidence of voluntary intoxication to negate the mental state required for implied-malice murder because "If section 22 applied only to express malice murder, there would have been no reason for the drafters to include 'malice aforethought' as an enumerated mental state because express malice is identical to a specific intent to unlawfully kill."

Other Questions


Is implied malice permitted a jury to convict a defendant of first degree murder based upon implied malice? (California, United States of America)
What is implied malice for the implied malice of a defendant in the second degree felony-murder doctrine? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant enters a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity at trial for a first-degree murder, can he still be found guilty of first degree murder? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's argument that he is not guilty of the crime of second degree murder of a fetus challenge his guilt of second-degree murder? (California, United States of America)
Does the jury instructions that the trial court relied on in its tentative order and in its final order deny defendant's petition that the jury must find that the killing was committed with either express or implied malice or otherwise implied malice? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant plead guilty to premeditated murder in order to prove that another defendant committed murder rather than manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
When will a defendant be found guilty of second degree murder based on implied malice or involuntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found guilty of aiding and abetting a murder if the actual perpetrator of the same murder is convicted of murder? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who requests instruction on a lesser-related charge of assault that includes the elements of implied malice murder be able to complain about the second degree murder instruction on appeal? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a prosecutor be found guilty of misconduct for making an argument to the jury that the jury must convict a defendant of second-degree murder before it returns a verdict on a charge of first degree murder? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.