Can a defendant be found guilty of aiding and abetting a murder if the actual perpetrator of the same murder is convicted of murder?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Prettyman, 14 Cal.4th 248, 58 Cal.Rptr.2d 827, 926 P.2d 1013 (Cal. 1996):

In Woods, the defendant and a companion went in search of a rival gang member. They entered the apartment of two acquaintances of the member of the rival gang, and assaulted the occupants. As they were leaving, they saw two people getting into a car. The defendant's companion fired into the car, killing one occupant and injuring the other. At trial, the prosecution's theory was that the defendant was criminally responsible for the shootings committed by his companion, contending that the shootings were a natural and probable consequence of the crimes committed in the apartment that the defendant had aided and abetted. During deliberations, the jury asked, "Can a defendant be found guilty of aiding and abetting a murder in the second degree if the actual perpetrator of the same murder is determined to be guilty of murder in the first degree?" The trial court answered, "No." The Court of Appeal held that this answer was prejudicial error. (People v. Woods, supra, 8 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1579-1590, 11 Cal.Rptr.2d 231.)

The Woods court reasoned that when the prosecution contends that the defendant is guilty as an accomplice under the "natural and probable consequences" doctrine, the defendant "does not stand in the same position as the perpetrator"; hence, "the aider and abettor and the perpetrator may have differing degrees of guilt based on the same conduct depending on which of the perpetrator's criminal acts were reasonably foreseeable under the [14 Cal.4th 276] circumstances and which were not." (People v. Woods, supra, 8 Cal.App.4th at pp. [926 P.2d 1030] 1586, 1587, 11 Cal.Rptr.2d 231, italics omitted.)

Other Questions


Can a defendant be found guilty of aiding and abetting a murder if the actual perpetrator is convicted of the same crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found guilty of a crime he does not personally commit if he aids and abets the actual perpetrator? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant enters a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity at trial for a first-degree murder, can he still be found guilty of first degree murder? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who aided and abetted a crime, the natural and probable consequence of which was murder, be convicted of the resulting murder? (California, United States of America)
If defendant and Rogers are convicted of second degree felony murder, can they be found guilty of furnishing and/or conspiring to murder? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a defendant be found guilty of aiding and abetting an attempted murder? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a defendant be able to appeal against his conviction for the murder of an elderly woman who was found guilty of murder by reason that he failed to obtain a certificate of probable cause? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a defendant be found guilty of aiding and abetting murder? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury find prejudice from a failure to give an aiding and abetting instruction when a defendant has been found guilty under instructions based on direct perpetrator liability? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a prosecutor be found guilty of misconduct for making an argument to the jury that the jury must convict a defendant of second-degree murder before it returns a verdict on a charge of first degree murder? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.