What are the consequences of a finding that a residential burglary was committed while other than an accomplice was present at the crime?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. McClanahan, A142345 (Cal. App. 2016):

Section 667.5, subdivision (c)(21) provides that a residential burglary is a violent felony where "it is charged and proved that another person, other than an accomplice, was present in the residence during the commission of the burglary." This finding is significant because it brings the crime within the statutory definition of a "violent felony" ( 667.5, subd. (c)), which in turn limits presentence and post-conviction custody credits to which the individual is entitled.5 ( 2933.1.) A defendant convicted of residential burglary alone without the special finding is entitled to one-for-one presentence conduct credits under section 4019 and may earn up to 50 percent good time/work time credits in prison under section 2933 and corresponding regulations, whereas a defendant convicted of a violent felony as defined in section 667.5, subdivision (c) is limited to 15 percent credit both before sentencing and while in prison under section 2933.1, subdivisions (a) and (c).6 (People v. Singleton (2007) 155 Cal.App.4th 1332, 1336-1337.) A finding that a burglary was committed while a non-accomplice was present in the residence thus potentially has the effect of increasing a defendant's actual time spent in custody.

Page 8

Other Questions


What is the test for a finding that a crime committed by appellant was committed with the specific intent to commit a crime against a specific gang member? (California, United States of America)
If a criminal commits a crime in a different county than the one where the crime was committed, would that change the outcome of the criminal trial if the crime occurred in the other county? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for finding that a burglary committed at the same time as receiving stolen property was a crime committed by the same person? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be held criminally responsible as an accomplice not only for the crime he intended to do but also for any other crime that is a natural and probable consequence of the target crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a defendant has committed a crime committed while an accomplice is also involved in the crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be held criminally responsible as an accomplice not only for the crime he intended to do but also for any other crime that is a natural and probable consequence of the crime? (California, United States of America)
Is the natural and probable consequences doctrine applied to a crime committed before the crime was committed? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the California Criminal Code preclude punishment for both burglary and theft where the crime was committed based on intent to commit the crime? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.