We find no error in the trial judge’s conclusion that a finding of consciousness of innocence was not warranted. The factors referred to by the appellant relate to the admissibility of evidence of an offer to take a polygraph test, and not to the inference to be drawn from such evidence once admitted. The conclusions reached by the trial judge concerning the proffered evidence of consciousness of innocence were available on the evidence. iii) Browne v. Dunn Error
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.