What is the test for an examination for discovery?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Worts (Re), 1977 CanLII 340 (BC SC):

The general rule is that an examination for discovery is in the nature of a cross-examination except that it is limited to the issues raised by the pleadings and “any question is permissible the answer to which may be relevant to the issues” per Hunter C.J. in Hopper v. Dunsmuir (No. 2) (1903), 19 B.C.R. 23 at 27. The test is whether the answer “may” be relevant, not whether it “must” be relevant.

Other Questions


Can counsel for the party being examined on examination for discovery interfere on cross-examination? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a defendant continue to examine for discovery after an examination for discovery has been adjourned? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a failure to complete document discovery an excuse for failing to attend an examination for discovery? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have counsel for the examining party been advised to conduct their own examination for discovery? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an applicant and respondent at a summary trial rely on expert reports, examinations for discovery, interrogatories, use of admissions, and expert reports? (British Columbia, Canada)
If evidence from examination for discovery is properly tendered, will the court order otherwise? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the court have to consider prior no fault examinations before making a decision on a no fault examination? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the scope of examination for discovery under the current BCSC Rules? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts considered viva voce evidence in an examination for discovery? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is this application for a continuation of the examination for discovery which took place in May 2014 dismissed? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.