If evidence from examination for discovery is properly tendered, will the court order otherwise?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Sampson v Holst, 2019 BCSC 561 (CanLII):
Even where evidence from examination for discovery may be properly tendered, the court retains discretion to order otherwise after considering fairness: More v. Bauer, 2010 BCSC 473 at para. 5.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a court order special costs for a defendant who altered records after the examination for discovery to bolster its claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court order that an order be made by the Court of Appeal be made in special circumstances? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the BC Supreme Court of Justice order a further review order to order that an expert in economic forecasting of the economic circumstances of a separated spouse be reviewed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the consent order of 1981 consent order on spousal support issue order apply to a nominal support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the proper procedure for tender discovery evidence on a summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for producing and tender all relevant evidence in proper reply evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts considered viva voce evidence in an examination for discovery? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a defendant continue to examine for discovery after an examination for discovery has been adjourned? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can counsel for the party being examined on examination for discovery interfere on cross-examination? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the proper course for a challenge of an order on the basis of new evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
