The applicable test in reviewing a decision of a prothonotary upon appeal is set out in Canada v. Aqua-Gem Investments, supra at p. 454, as follows: ... I am of the opinion that such orders ought to be disturbed on appeal only where it has been made to appear that (a) they are clearly wrong, in the sense that the exercise of discretion by the prothonotary was based upon a wrong principle or upon a misapprehension of the facts, or (b) in making them, the prothonotary improperly exercised his discretion on a question vital to the final issue of the case.
Get a full legal research memo!
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.