What is the standard of review applicable to review of a decision of an adjudicator appointed pursuant to the Canada Labour Code?
Canada (Federal), Canada
The following excerpt is from Poitras v. Kehewin Cree Nation, 2000 CanLII 15012 (FC):
With respect to the privative clause, in Air Canada v. Norman J. Davis, 4 Muldoon, J. discussed the standard of review applicable to judicial review of the decision of an adjudicator appointed pursuant to the Canada Labour Code. He concluded that the standard of review with respect to errors within jurisdiction is that of patent unreasonableness whereas, with respect to the question of jurisdiction, the standard is one of correctness.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard of review applicable to a judicial review of a decision of an adjudicator appointed pursuant to the Canada Labour Code? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is a judicial review application directed against a negative PRRA decision moot where the Applicant for judicial review has been removed from or voluntarily left Canada? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can a decision maker such as the Immigration Officer on an application for permanent residents in Canada be reviewed on a higher standard of review of patent unreasonableness? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable to a decision of review on a pure question of fact such as whether a marriage is bona fide? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the applicable standard of review for the purpose of determining an applicant's application for employment? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable in a judicial review of a visa officer's decision? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable to a panel decision based on a lack of credibility in the refugee status applicant? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
For the purposes of denying a motion for judicial review of a decision by the Board of Arbitration for Justice denying an application to review the denial of the motion, in what circumstances will the motion be reviewed? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a hearing officer disagrees with a decision made by the reviewing officer on the issues with which he disagreed with the hearing officer, how will the review officer's decision be considered? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In reviewing the application of a sophisticated means enhancement, what is the difference between a de novo review and a clear error review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
