The father suggests that the test for variation of a temporary order was set out by Blishen J. in Biddle v. Biddle [2005] O.J. No. 737, at paragraph 18, where she indicated that, The jurisprudence with respect to the variation of interim support orders indicates that such applications are not to be encouraged and that a substantial change in circumstances is necessary before such application should be permitted.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.