The first question to be addressed is the standard of review. The plaintiff submits that the standard of review of a duty of consultation to be applied is that articulated by the court in Haida Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests), [2004] 3 S.C.R. 511, 2004 SCC 73 [Haida], namely, correctness with respect to questions of law, and reasonableness with respect to questions of mixed law and fact and with respect to the process itself.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.