What is the standard of review for the purpose of determining correctness?
Manitoba, Canada
The following excerpt is from Sekhon v. Minister of Education and Training, 2018 MBQB 99 (CanLII):
The parties agree that in the years since Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190, the standard of review when dealing with procedural fairness has been correctness.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard of review for the purpose of determining whether a claim is valid or invalid? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is a shareholder's right to access corporate information reviewable on a standard of correctness? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the proper standard of review in the judicial review process? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review for the identification and application of the correct legal principles? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the proper standard of review in the context of a motion for judicial review? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review for judicial review of administrative decisions? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review on an application for judicial review? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the compensatory method for the purpose of determining the amount of support awarded to a spouse who works in the home? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of deference the court owes to a motion judge in reviewing an order of support? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review for appeals from support orders? (Manitoba, Canada)
