What is the proper standard of review in the judicial review process?
Manitoba, Canada
The following excerpt is from Whellams Lane Residents’, 2010 MBQB 256 (CanLII):
One of the issues with which I must deal is the proper standard of review. The seminal decision on that issue is that of Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9; [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190. The first relevant principle to be derived from Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, supra, is that there are now two standards of review in the judicial review process, namely, correctness and reasonableness (at para. 45).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the proper standard of review in the context of a motion for judicial review? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review on an application for judicial review? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review for judicial review of administrative decisions? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard for a judicial review of a penalty imposed by a professional body? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of reasonableness in a judicial review? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is section 8(1) of the 2019 Decision barred judicial review? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review for appeals from support orders? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable in a civil case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What standard of review applies to a question of law, fact and inference? (Manitoba, Canada)
How has reasonableness been defined in the context of a judicial review? (Manitoba, Canada)
