What is the standard of review on an application for judicial review?
Manitoba, Canada
The following excerpt is from L.T. v. Winnipeg Child and Family Services et al., 2009 MBQB 248 (CanLII):
Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190, held that there should only be two standards of review on an application for judicial review – correctness and reasonableness.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the proper standard of review in the judicial review process? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the proper standard of review in the context of a motion for judicial review? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review for judicial review of administrative decisions? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review in a child support application? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard for a judicial review of a penalty imposed by a professional body? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable in a civil case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of reasonableness in a judicial review? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of appellate review applicable to all factual conclusions of a trial judge? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the applicable standard of review for the appeal of a decision in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the applicable standard of review for errors of law? (Manitoba, Canada)
