In Phillips v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2011 BCSC 576, after reviewing the applicable law, the standard of patently unreasonable was described as “clearly irrational” and “evidently not in accordance with reason” (at para. 31), or “so flawed that no amount of curial deference can justify letting it stand” (at para. 32).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.