How have courts treated the "patentently unreasonable standard" of standard of conduct in cases involving mixed fact and law?

Does the Court of Appeal in Dunsmuir hold that a patent unreasonableness standard set forth in s. 59(3) and (4) of the Anti-Patent Unreasonableness Act? (British Columbia, Canada)

Is there any case law or case law that would require the court to conduct a minute analysis of a joint bank account? (British Columbia, Canada)

How have courts treated oppressive conduct and unfairly prejudicial conduct? (British Columbia, Canada)

How have courts treated medical malpractice in cases involving an ectopic pregnancy? (British Columbia, Canada)

What is the impact of the Court of Appeal Tribunal’s "unreasonable" and "patently unreasonable" interpretation of policy by the tribunal? (British Columbia, Canada)

What is the standard of review for appellate review in cases involving mixed fact and law? (British Columbia, Canada)

What is the case law in favour of the Court of Appeal in the case of the Supreme Court of Canada's most senior judge in the matter of personal injury? (British Columbia, Canada)

Is there any case law where a party who has not made full disclosure to a court has to prove to the court that there has been full disclosure? (British Columbia, Canada)

Does the standard of review apply to a review of a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal decision to which the decision was patently unreasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)

How have courts awarded damages for loss of amenity in cases involving cutting trees on someone else's property? (British Columbia, Canada)