The applicant has not established that the separation agreement includes a “special provision”, i.e. one that is out of the ordinary or unusual, replaces the need for ongoing child support and benefits the children. What is critical is whether the provision objectively benefits the children and an important factor to consider is how the level of support in the agreement compares to the support that would otherwise be required under the CSG. Quinn v. Keiper [2007] O.J. No. 3643. Even if the property settlement term was a “special provision”, the applicant has not established that the applicable CSG support would result in an amount of child support that would be inequitable.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.