There is no doubt that a long line of cases, which need not be mentioned, establish the rule that, in general, the debtor is not a necessary or proper party to actions of this sort when, having transferred his property, he has no further interest in it, and it is only sought to set aside his conveyance as fraudulent as against creditors. But, as pointed out by Lamont, J. in Mills v. Harris & Craske, supra, that rule does not apply where relief is asked against the debtor.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.