The following excerpt is from Clark v. Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union,AEL-CIO-CLC, Local 414, 1991 CanLII 6065 (ON LRB):
10. The rule in Browne v. Dunn makes it clear that any evidence that is intended to be used and that could be used to impeach the credibility of a witness that had not been brought to the particular attention of that witness when s/he testified should not be introduced by opposing counsel. But the rule does not apply to situations where the evidence is introduced for purposes other than impeaching credibility.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.