I would allow the application to introduce fresh evidence. The evidence meets the requirements of the test in Palmer v. The Queen, 1979 CanLII 8 (SCC),  1 S.C.R. 759, at p. 775: it could not have been adduced at trial, it is relevant, it is credible, and it could reasonably be expected to have affected the result.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.