How have the courts treated the credibility of the complainant's evidence in a sexual assault trial?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. D.H., 2016 ONCA 569 (CanLII):

One way the trial judge avoided the need to resolve some of the problems she perceived with the credibility of the complainant’s evidence, including when it conflicted with her mother’s evidence, was by discounting them as referable to peripheral matters, as a trial judge is entitled to do: R v. W. (R.), 1992 CanLII 56 (SCC), [1992] 2 S.C.R. 122, at pp. 134, 135-36.

Other Questions


How has the trial judge assessed the credibility of the complainant in a sexual assault case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the credibility of conflicting evidence in a sexual assault trial? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the Court treated sexual assault and indecent assault cases? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts treated the evidence in a sexual assault case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the current sentencing range for an assault where the accused has pleaded guilty to a charge of assault, assault and sexual assault? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court sentence an offender who sexually assaulted a 15 year old girl who was sexually assaulted by friends of her parents who plied her victim with alcohol? (Ontario, Canada)
What factors will the court consider in assessing the credibility of a sexual assault complainant when assessing the timing of disclosure? (Ontario, Canada)
How is credibility determined in a sexual assault trial? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the rule in the context of dismissal of a complainant in a sexual assault case? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a trial judge consider corroborating evidence in a sexual assault case? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.