Can a decision of the adjudicator be reviewed on the standard of reasonableness?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Grewal v British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2017 BCSC 2284 (CanLII):

Counsel before me agreed that the decision of the adjudicator was subject to review on the standard of reasonableness, which applies to both the process and the outcome. The review must consider whether the decision of the adjudicator is found within the range of reasonable outcomes, and whether the reasoning process applied by the adjudicator is transparent and intelligible as part of a single analysis. See Kenyon v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 BCCA 485, at para. 32-35.

Other Questions


Can a decision made by a municipality be reviewed by the standard of reasonableness? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the reasonableness standard for a judicial review of a decision made by an adjudicator? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a decision of the adjudicator’s decision of November 1, 2016? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the reasonableness standard for a judicial review of a decision by a provincial superintendent of motor vehicles? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of reasonableness of a decision by a Superintendent of Motor Vehicles? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the reasonableness standard for a judicial review to set aside a decision? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a decision about extending time for a human rights complaint be reviewed for reasonableness? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the reasonableness standard for a review of a Minister’s decision? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a decision maker such as the Immigration Officer on an application for permanent residents in Canada be reviewed on a higher standard of review of patent unreasonableness? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the reasonableness standard for a Minister to make a decision in respect of Charter rights? (British Columbia, Canada)