Counsel before me agreed that the decision of the adjudicator was subject to review on the standard of reasonableness, which applies to both the process and the outcome. The review must consider whether the decision of the adjudicator is found within the range of reasonable outcomes, and whether the reasoning process applied by the adjudicator is transparent and intelligible as part of a single analysis. See Kenyon v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 BCCA 485, at para. 32-35.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.