What is the reasonableness standard for a judicial review of a decision made by an adjudicator?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Semeniuk v British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2017 BCSC 834 (CanLII):

The Court of Appeal provided further direction on the proper application of the reasonableness standard to judicial review of adjudicators’ decisions in Kenyon v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 BCCA 485 at paras. 53 and 55:

Other Questions


What is the standard of review for a judicial review of a decision of an adjudicator confirming a roadside driving prohibition? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the standards of review applicable to a judicial review of a decision made under the Rules of Review Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a decision of the adjudicator’s decision of November 1, 2016? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the reasonableness standard for a judicial review of a decision by a provincial superintendent of motor vehicles? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of reasonableness of a judicial review of a decision made by a Superintendent of Motor Vehicles? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the reasonableness standard for a judicial review to set aside a decision? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review on a judicial review of a decision of the Superintendent to uphold an IRP? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the standard of review apply to a review of a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal decision to which the decision was patently unreasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the reasonableness standard of review in judicial review? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a judicial review decision by a chambers judge who failed to take the necessary steps to review a decision by the chambers judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.