What is the reasonableness standard for a judicial review of a decision by a provincial superintendent of motor vehicles?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Cross v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2017 BCSC 140 (CanLII):

The Court of Appeal provided the following direction on the proper application of the reasonableness standard to judicial review of adjudicators’ decisions in Kenyon v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 BCCA 485 at paras. 53 and 55:

Other Questions


What is the standard of reasonableness of a judicial review of a decision made by a Superintendent of Motor Vehicles? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the authorities relating to judicial review of a decision to confirm or revoke a decision by the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles under s. 215.41? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for judicial review of a decision by a Superintendent of Motor Vehicles under s. 215.5 of the Motor Vehicle Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of reasonableness of a decision by a Superintendent of Motor Vehicles? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for judicial review of a decision by the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a decision by a Superintendent of Motor Vehicles in a bar case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a Superintendent of Motor Vehicles decision in a bar case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of reasonableness for a decision by a Superintendent of Motor Vehicles? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review on a judicial review of a decision of the Superintendent to uphold an IRP? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the reasonableness standard for a judicial review to set aside a decision? (British Columbia, Canada)