Does a review board have any responsibility for the ongoing assessment and management of a person who has been found not criminally responsible?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from R. v. Ontario (Review Board), 2009 ONCA 16 (CanLII):
As noted in Winko v. British Columbia (Forensic Psychiatric Institute), 1999 CanLII 694 (SCC), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 625, under Part XX.1 of the Criminal Code, review boards bear the responsibility for the ongoing assessment and management of persons found to have committed criminal offences for which they are held not criminally responsible.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for finding a person not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a motion seeking an assessment of a person who has been found to be incapable of doing so? (Ontario, Canada)
What steps must the Assessment Review Board take to determine the value of a property for purposes of property tax? (Ontario, Canada)
How is credibility assessed in the context of criminal or quasi-criminal trials? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for assessing eye response responses in a brain injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied to a review of an assessment officer’s decision? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a director, a manager of a condominium, or another person, perform the work of a solicitor’s review and redaction? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an Assessment Officer to be reviewed by the Court of Appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law in which a social host has been found liable for serving alcohol to a person who was later found to be intoxicated? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there a defence of responsible communication available where the publication was responsible? (Ontario, Canada)
