Lastly, the respondent took the positon that many of the communications between the parties upon which the claimant relies are protected by privilege. I disagree. Correspondence between counsel is admissible when the issue is whether or not an agreement claimed by one party has in fact been reached: Elves v. White, 2005 BCSC 1191 at paras. 33-34; Flint v. Taggar, 2007 BCSC 1943, rev’d 2008 BCCA 504 but not on this point.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.