Does absolute privilege extend to communications by lawyers in respect of judicial proceedings?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from McKerracher v Neustater, 2022 BCSC 389 (CanLII):

The Court in Hamouth v. Edwards & Angell, 2005 BCCA 172, concluded that absolute privilege extends to communications by lawyers in respect of judicial proceedings:

Other Questions


Does absolute privilege apply to communications by lawyers in respect of judicial proceedings? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does absolute privilege apply to lawyers and witnesses in preparation for judicial proceedings? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does litigation privilege apply to communications between lawyers and third parties? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can litigation privilege apply to privileged communications between lawyers and clients? (Manitoba, Canada)
Does a statement made in a quasi-judicial proceeding constitute absolute privilege? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does solicitor-client privilege apply to communications between lawyers and clients? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the common law defence of fair and accurate reporting in respect of judicial proceedings? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is absolute privilege and what is the test for absolute privilege? (Ontario, Canada)
What privilege does solicitor privilege apply to confidential communications between solicitor and client? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a member of a judicial or quasi-judicial tribunal be held absolute immunity from action for comments made in a decision made pursuant to a statutory duty imposed on the tribunal? (British Columbia, Canada)