Does litigation privilege apply to communications between lawyers and third parties?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Wexler v. Bhullar, 2006 BCSC 1466 (CanLII):

Litigation privilege is not restricted to communications between a lawyer and client, but may attach to communications with third parties where the dominant purpose of the communication is preparation for litigation. In Blank v. Canada (Minister of Justice), 2006 SCC 39, Fish J. wrote at para. 27: Litigation privilege, on the other hand, is not directed at, still less, restricted to, communications between solicitor and client. It contemplates, as well, communications between a solicitor and third parties or, in the case of an unrepresented litigant, between the litigant and third parties. Its object is to ensure the efficacy of the adversarial process and not to promote the solicitor-client relationship. And to achieve this purpose, parties to litigation, represented or not, must be left to prepare their contending positions in private, without adversarial interference and without fear of premature disclosure.

Unlike solicitor-client or legal advice privilege, litigation privilege does not depend on the communications being confidential in nature: First, solicitor-client privilege applies only to confidential communications between the client and his solicitor. Litigation privilege, on the other hand, applies to communications of a non-confidential nature between the solicitor and third parties and even includes material of a non-communicative nature. R.J. Sharpe, “Claiming Privilege in the Discovery Process”, in Law in Transition: Evidence, [1984] Special Lect. L.S.U.C. 163, at pp. 164-65, as quoted in Blank v. Canada, at para. 28.

Other Questions


Does the law of agency apply when one party gives explicit or implicit authority to another party (the principal) to enter contracts with third parties? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does litigation privilege apply to third party opinions? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there an implied waiver of privilege where a party waives privilege but takes a position in relation to privileged materials that is inconsistent with maintaining privilege? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a third party notice seeking contribution and indemnity from third party religious orders that were responsible for supervision and operation of residential schools? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a waiver of privilege apply to settlement negotiations involving third parties? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a third party responsible for the costs of a plaintiff who alleges that one of the third parties has failed to draft specifications to clearly state that certain fireproofing is to be asbestos-free? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does litigation privilege apply to communications between solicitor and client? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does litigation privilege apply to communications that are not confidential? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is litigation privilege and what is the argument that litigation privilege means? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does absolute privilege apply to communications by lawyers in respect of judicial proceedings? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.