The Respondent argues against summary judgment validating and enforcing the “agreement”. For this, she relies entirely on the ruling of my brother Quinn J. in Riss v. Greenough, [2003] CanLII 2224 (ONSC) at para. 32 that the “straightforward, uncomplicated requirement” of subrule 18(4) “is also mandatory. The lack of a signature by counsel is sufficient to invalidate the offer”.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.