What is the remedy for a failure to allow counsel to engage in argument?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Manolescu, 2002 ABQB 639 (CanLII):

The decision of our Court of Appeal in Fraser v. Fraser (1994), 1994 ABCA 275 (CanLII), 157 A.R. 98 (C.A.) provides at para. 10 the remedy for the failure to allow the parties to engage in argument: A fundamental procedural error such as the failure to afford counsel an opportunity to present argument is fatal to the proceedings and must result in a new trial.

Other Questions


What remedies are available to a judge who finds counsel in breach of the principle of leading a party to lead contradictory evidence? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a husband who has agreed to pay spousal support without the benefit of legal counsel argue that when he signed an agreement to pay support, when he did not have the legal counsel? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a failure by a corporation to meet statutory notice requirements a remedy for improperly notified shareholders? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court allow the Court to amend the Rules of Civil Procedure to allow the Courts to use the functional approach? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the common law remedy of damages for failure to provide specific performance? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court allow a defendant to charge a second counsel fee? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there any evidence that would have allowed the jury to engage in a credibility contest? (Alberta, Canada)
When will separate counsel be allowed to cross-examine a co-defendant? (Alberta, Canada)
In a non-parental application for access to a child, does the court need to be careful not to allow the argument of conflict or potential conflict to defeat the application? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in Canada with respect to oppression remedies? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.