The distinction between an agreement for sale and a mortgage, and the court's limited jurisdiction with respect to the former, have long been recognized in our law. In Davidson v. Sharpe, 1920 CanLII 83 (SCC), 60 S.C.R. 72, [1920] 1 W.W.R. 888 at 896-97, 52 D.L.R. 186, Anglin J. stated: The anomalies introduced by Courts of equity in regard to the relations between mortgagor and mortgagee do not exist in regard to vendor and purchaser.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.