See also the case of Hawrish v. Bank of Montreal (1969), 1969 CanLII 2 (SCC), 2 D.L.R. (3d) 600 at p. 605,  S.C.R. 515 at p. 520: My opinion is that the appellant’s argument fails on the ground that the collateral agreement allowing for the discharge of the appellant cannot stand as it clearly contradicts the terms of the guarantee bond which state that it is a continuing guarantee. … a collateral agreement cannot be established where it is inconsistent with or contradicts the written agreement.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.