Is parol evidence admissible to establish that an oral agreement does not conflict with the written contract?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Lama Lo Holdings Ltd. v. Gurnisch Development Corp., 5908 Holdings Ltd. and Ralph Schwartzman, 2013 BCSC 2224 (CanLII):

The authorities establish that to avoid injustice, parol evidence is not absolutely inadmissible. Evidence of an oral agreement may be admissible to establish a collateral agreement which does not conflict with the written contract and, although oral, is enforceable. Parol evidence will also be admitted if there is an alleged misrepresentation or to show that a contract is invalid on the basis of mistake: Gallen v. Nunweiler (1984) 9 D.L.R. (4th) at paras.33-35 (B.C.C.A.).

Other Questions


What is the test for establishing a collateral agreement where the collateral agreement is inconsistent with or contradicts the written agreement? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the parole evidence rule prevent extrinsic evidence from adding to, varying, contradicting or subtracting from the written contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the parol evidence rule apply to a payment agreement where the payment agreement states that no refunds should be made unless the payment policy is less than one month's notice? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for the construction of a contract where a clause in the contract states that a condition fundamental to the agreement must be met before the contract can be signed? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for admissible evidence that contradicts the terms of a written contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the parol evidence rule preclude evidence of the oral part of an agreement that is partly in writing? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a contract is partly written and partly oral, can the parol evidence rule apply? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of damages for damages for breach of a contract where the contract price of a parcel of land was significantly lower than the value of the land at the time the contract was signed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an unwritten collateral contract that goes to the root of the reason for one party entering into the subsequent written agreement be enforced? (British Columbia, Canada)
When a contract is signed and signed, can a party who signed it before and at the time of the contract be found to have misrepresented the agreement? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.