The judge referred to the fact that the onus was on the party seeking to set aside the agreement, citing Tian v. Cheung, 2016 BCSC 950 at para. 61. She noted the appellant’s argument that, like the wife in Tian, she had no input into the agreement, she never saw it before seeing the lawyer, she was a vulnerable immigrant, and there was a power imbalance at the time of the making of the agreement. The judge was not persuaded that the appellant’s circumstances were akin to the wife in Tian.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.