What is the current interpretation of the Recovery of Possession of Land Act?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Pelletier v. Caplan, 1945 CanLII 139 (SK QB):
There seems to be a dearth of authority an the interpretation of the said Act. Recently I decided in Trotzuk v. Zilka (unreported) that there was no right under The Recovery of Possession of Land Act to settle questions of law bona fide raised as to questions of title although, as here, I found against the respondent on the facts.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How has the Rule of Civil Procedure been interpreted and interpreted in the context of a default judgment? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have words like “my surviving children” been interpreted in a will and how have they been interpreted? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in relation to the interpretation of the text-books and the various legal principles used by the Court of Appeal to determine whether an agent is bound by the contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in the United States with respect to the privacy rights of internet subscribers? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted answers to the jury in a medical malpractice case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the patent unreasonableness standard in the interpretation of a collective agreement? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What constitutes an "unusual danger" to a person who is in possession of an unoccupied building? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on third party procedure in King’s Bench? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a joint tenant get possession of the premises? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the legal test for interpretation of a contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
