What is the reasonableness of a contingent fee agreement?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Cope v. Dickson, 2002 BCSC 98 (CanLII):

I recently had occasion to consider the matter of the reasonableness of a contingent fee agreement in Kelly v. McMillan et al, 2001 BCSC 1556. At paras. 24 – 25, I stated:

Other Questions


Is there any precedent for increased costs in a contingency agreement where there has been significant recovery under contingency agreements? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing a collateral agreement where the collateral agreement is inconsistent with or contradicts the written agreement? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a lawyer who entered into a fixed fee agreement with a client without the client signing a written agreement with respect to the amount of money that was deposited into his general account? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the onus on a party seeking to set aside an agreement that was entered into the agreement? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is reasonable conduct in litigation reasonable enough to warrant a reduction in costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an arbitrator deal with a collective agreement that expressly or inferentially arises out of the collective agreement? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between a contingency fee agreement and a fee-for-service contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on the issue of "reasonableness" under a percentage fee agreement? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an occupier to prove reasonable steps taken by the occupier were reasonable in all circumstances? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between an agreement to agree and an expression by the parties that a completed agreement is to be memorialized? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.