What is the presumption of private ownership by the adjacent landowner to the midpoint?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Chippewas of Saugeen First Nation et al. v. The Attorney General of Canada et al., 2021 ONSC 4181 (CanLII):

For non-tidal waters, the presumption is private ownership by the adjacent landowner to the mid-point, but it is subject to the public right of navigation if the waters are navigable: Caldwell v. McLaren, [1884] U.K.P.C. 21, at p. 10.

Other Questions


Can an individual seek private interest standing against an administrative order that interferes with a private right? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a driver who exits a private driveway and crosses a highway from a private road or driveway avoid a collision? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there a presumption that badges of fraud constitute a presumption of intent to defraud, defeat or delay creditors? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there a special circumstance where the adjacent owner of the adjacent store is deemed an occupier of the municipal sidewalk? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the responsibilities owed by adjacent landowners to each other for the passage of water from one property to the other? (Ontario, Canada)
Can dedication and acceptance be applied to roads on private land in unorganized territories? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a police officer's failure to investigate and prosecute for breach of duty constitute a duty of care to a private individual? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for rebutting the presumption in a civil case? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the court considered control and access to the area in question in determining whether the public had access and invited to use the area on the private property for parking purposes? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for rebutting the presumption of not intending to drive? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.