Is there a presumption that badges of fraud constitute a presumption of intent to defraud, defeat or delay creditors?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Ernst & Young Inc. v. Aquino, 2021 ONSC 527 (CanLII):

The existence of badges of fraud creates a rebuttable presumption of the intention to defraud, defeat or delay creditors. The onus then shifts to those defending the fraud to adduce evidence to show the absence of fraudulent intent: Purcaru v. Seliverstova, 2015 ONSC 6679, 69 R.F.L. (7th) 388 at para. 57.

Other Questions


If there was an intention to defeat creditors at the time of the conveyance, does that matter to present or future creditors? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a conveyance was executed with intent to delay or defeat creditors? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the intention of a debtor making a disposition that is intended to defeat, hinder or delay his creditors? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for evidence of intent to defeat, hinder or delay creditors? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for proving intent to defeat or delay creditors? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the pleading of equitable fraud constitute unconscionable or equitable fraud? (Ontario, Canada)
If a parent is intentionally undereployed, is it a bad faith or intention to evade support obligations inherent in intentional underemployment? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of the legislation that declares an instrument that sought to be impeached void as against creditors if made with intent to give preference to creditors? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a delay in obtaining a date for a civil jury trial constitute prejudice and justify striking out a jury notice? (Ontario, Canada)
How strong a case of fraud is necessary to defeat a claim for legal professional privilege? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.