The defendants assert that the plan proposed by the plaintiff is not a workable plan. It defers for later procedural steps to clarify the common issues and to determine the appropriate course for any outstanding individual issues. The defendants argue that this vague and indefinite approach underlies the failure of the plaintiff to demonstrate any workable plan. The plan is essentially the same as the plan which was described in Ernewein v. General Motors of Canada Ltd. (2005), 46 B.C.L.R. (4th) 234, 2005 BCCA 540, at ¶14.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.