Is a plaintiff’s plan a workable framework for moving the case forward?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Jiang v. Vancouver City Savings Credit Union, 2019 BCCA 149 (CanLII):
Class proceedings are flexible and dynamic and a litigation plan need only be a workable framework for moving the case forward. (Tucci v. Peoples Trust Company, 2017 BCSC 1525). In my view the plaintiff’s plan is such a framework.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for liability when a collision occurs between a plaintiff motor vehicle and a forward vehicle? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for a parent who says that they will not move with their child if the child is not permitted to move with them? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there a need for physical or temporal proximity between a plaintiff and plaintiff in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a judge finds that a plaintiff has violated a plaintiff’s human rights in a civil case, does this rule apply? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between a custodial parent wishing to move and the access parent seeking to move? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for adding plaintiffs to a proposed class action where the named and proposed representative plaintiff has no legitimate cause of action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to an award for costs of future care for a plaintiff who was injured in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to be treated as a thin-skulled plaintiff for the purpose of damage assessment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied by the Court of Appeal in determining the apportionment of fault between a plaintiff and plaintiff? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between a plaintiff and a plaintiff who asserts that their engagement is at an end because of disability and resultant absence from work? (British Columbia, Canada)
