The plaintiff’s claim is for damages arising from the defendant’s occupation and use of certain lands as a gas service station from 1985 to 1997. The plaintiff claims the defendants’ negligence has caused hydrocarbon contamination of the sub-soils and sub-surface waters, with resulting loss and damage to the plaintiff. It has advanced a number of alternative claims—namely (i) a claim for damages arising from the defendants’ creation of a continuing nuisance on the property; (ii) a claim for damages under the doctrine in Rylands v. Fletcher (1866) L.R. 1 Ex. 265 at 279, affirmed (1868), L.R. 3 H.L. 330; and finally (iii) a claim for indemnification under the terms of the lease.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.