What is the test for providing particulars in an undertakings?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Ironside v. Wong, 2003 ABQB 161 (CanLII):
It is questionable whether the Plaintiff is correct in his position that he need not provide those particulars requested in undertakings No. 6, No. 7, and No. 8. In this regard the Rudovics case, supra, and Toplensky v. Howe [1996] A.J. No. 1172 [M.C.] are instructive.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the defence treated undertaking 1 and undertaking 2 in the defence? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the implied undertaking of an implied undertaking apply to the use of a searchable searchable database? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will deponents be required to provide their own undertakings? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for reasonable accommodation provided by a service provider to an employee who suffers from multiple sclerosis? (Alberta, Canada)
If a garnishee summons is served after crystallization of the security provided by the debenture, which should have priority? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a party argue that a response to an undertaking has materially advanced the action? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the court interpreted an offer to maintain a water system and provide water to a number of residents? (Alberta, Canada)
Can directors of a company purchase their shares without disclosing pending negotiations for the sale of the company's undertaking? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a party to respond to an undertaking? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a fee to provide funds for the discharge of indebtedness incurred for the construction of a student union building which included an auditorium and would, to a certain extent, be used for the conduct of classes? (Alberta, Canada)
