Is paragraph 6 sufficient to support an order for service ex juris?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Semeniuk v. Patel, 2003 ABQB 461 (CanLII):
It is clear from what is said by Sanderman J. in the Alberta Cement Corporation v. Bakewell case, quoted above, that paragraph 6, quoted above is not sufficient to support the order for service ex juris I made. It is not sufficient because it does not provide enough detail.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does remarriage of a divorced spouse entitled to court-ordered support from a former spouse automatically justify or discharge a subsisting order for spousal and child support? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a court order all court-ordered sales of a personal injury property be exempt from all court ordered sales? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of proof required for a plaintiff to obtain an order for service ex juris? (Alberta, Canada)
Is sufficient knowledge sufficient to support an additional claim? (Alberta, Canada)
Is child support for two children calculated based on the Federal Child Support Guidelines? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there a public policy reason in support of enrichment where domestic services have been provided in common law? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for establishing that there is sufficient evidence to support a finding of fraud? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the court considered the relationship between child support and spousal support? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a court impute income under section 19(1)(a) of the Child Support Guidelines where the payor has pursued a deliberate course of conduct for the purpose of evading child support obligations? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a jury to determine whether a trial can be conveniently conducted by a jury? (Alberta, Canada)
