Is there a public policy reason in support of enrichment where domestic services have been provided in common law?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Lakusta v. Jones, 1997 CanLII 14903 (AB QB):

Similarly, it was clearly stated by McLachlin J. in Peter v. Beblow, supra at p. 339 that there is no public policy reason in support of the enrichment where domestic services have been provided in the context of a common-law relationship.

Other Questions


Can a common law relationship result in unjust enrichment of the beneficiary of the domestic service? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for reasonable accommodation provided by a service provider to an employee who suffers from multiple sclerosis? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there any common law common law concept or common law relation to corporate shields or corporate vale? (Alberta, Canada)
In a common law common-law relationship, what is the test for calculating the equalization of benefits between spouses and their common law partners? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a common law wife entitled to use the term "common law husband" in the context of the common law husband? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for unjust enrichment for domestic services? (Alberta, Canada)
Does remarriage of a divorced spouse entitled to court-ordered support from a former spouse automatically justify or discharge a subsisting order for spousal and child support? (Alberta, Canada)
Is it contrary to public policy to hold a customer to an exclusionary clause? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a court impute income under section 19(1)(a) of the Child Support Guidelines where the payor has pursued a deliberate course of conduct for the purpose of evading child support obligations? (Alberta, Canada)
What services provided by a professional accountant may not be within the broad scope of reviewing and reporting on financial information? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.