The respondent submits that the onus is on the applicant to justify a departure from the Guideline amount of support. I disagree. The court in Francis v. Baker unequivocally stated that the presumption in favour of the Guideline amount does not compel a party seeking to challenge that amount to call evidence, and no adverse inference should be drawn from their failure to do so. (para. 43)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.