Is a Minister required to provide reasons for his decision?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Fenske v. Alberta (Minister of Environment), 2000 ABQB 664 (CanLII):

The Minister is not required by the Act to provide reasons for his decision (s. 92). Unless required by the enabling legislation, tribunals are generally not under a common-law duty to provide reasons for their decisions (Baker v. Canada (1999), 1999 CanLII 699 (SCC), 174 D.L.R. (4th) 193, at para. 37 (S.C.C.)).

Other Questions


What is the test for reasonable accommodation provided by a service provider to an employee who suffers from multiple sclerosis? (Alberta, Canada)
Is the application of the standard of review to the substance of the decisions of the Director of Public Prosecutions or the Minister of Justice? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there a public policy reason in support of enrichment where domestic services have been provided in common law? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a witness at an employment tribunal be required to provide general confirmatory information? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a home inspector responsible for failing to provide a reasonable visual inspection? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will deponents be required to provide their own undertakings? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there a difference between legislation which treats one section of the population more harshly than all others by reason of race and legislation providing additional benefits to one class of women? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for reasonable use of the word “reasonable person” in a civil matter? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for interpretation of a clause in a contract where a plaintiff is required to provide a written assurance of his own rights? (Alberta, Canada)
How long is a spouse required to continue to provide financial support for each other? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.